Обратная связь

Dear authors of our periodical!

The editorial Board of the journal "Methods of quality management" accepts articles, notes, reviews, reflections, information and other materials on issues of quality management, reliability and security.

Of most interest are the materials about the experience of using methods of quality management in Russian enterprises (both positive and negative).

Ideas and concepts for future publications can be discussed with the chief editor, sending drafts or plans to address: mmq@mirq.ru.

The basic requirements to the content: topicality, usefulness, novelty.

Publishes articles of interdisciplinary character and practical orientation, as well as specialized articles if the experience described in them can be applied in other industries.

Articles of a theoretical nature must contain a new formulation of the task or use a new mathematical apparatus, and must be given the opportunity (examples) practical application of the obtained results.

Articles on analysis and ensure reliability during the various stages of the development, production, testing and operation of technical products must carry General in nature and contain specific recommendations for the use of this experience in the development or revision of normative documents.

Should be consistency of terminology, dimensions, symbols, abbreviations. Units physical quantities should conform to the SI system.

Used in the article English terms must be translated into Russian language and abbreviations deciphered. The editorial Board reserves the right to change the title of the article and to accomplish editorial changes do not distort the meaning of the article. The volume submitted to the journal article must be no more than 20 thousand characters.

The articles submitted to the journal should have the following structure:

introduction (verbal formulation of the problem and an explanation of the purpose of the article);

mathematical formulation of the problem (for theoretical articles);

problem solution method (method, without cumbersome calculations, feasibility analysis, etc. for theoretical papers or the main content for others);

analysis of the obtained results (the difference between the proposed methods from known, their advantages compared to other, etc.);

summary of the results of applying the proposed method (for theoretical papers, in addition to specifying the scope of necessary numerical example);

the main conclusions of the work, including on the applicability of the experience or the method in other sectors of the economy;

the list of references.

Please also in the preparation of articles for CMI to comply with rules required by the technological process prepress of the magazine. Please send material by email to the editor at: mmq@mirq.ru.

Types of medium accepted: CD, DVD.

File names must not exceed 8 characters.

Acceptable file formats:

It is necessary to provide references to the graphical objects in the text by numbering them in parentheses, e.g. (Fig. 1).

Each article shall be accompanied by:

If the article was returned for revision, when re-sending to the editorial office it should do the inscription on 1st page: "Modified copy".

The authors are responsible for the content of articles and the fact of their publication.

The editors do not always share the opinions of the authors and is not responsible for the uncertainty of published data.

The editorial Board have the right to withdraw an already published article if it becomes clear that in the process of publication has violated someone's rights or General norms of scientific ethics.

The editors have the right to withdraw an already published article if it becomes clear that in the process of publication has violated someone's rights or General norms of scientific ethics.

Articles and provided CDS and DVDs, and other materials won't be returned.

Articles prepared without taking into account the above rules, won't be accepted.

Keeping these simple rules, you facilitate the processing of articles and speed up the publication of your material. Thank you!


1. Submitted articles are registered by the Executive Secretary of the editorial office. The author receives e-mail notification of articles, and the mark about the time reading of the letter is recorded in the log.

2. Responsible Secretary of the editorial Board pre-determines the compliance of the manuscript to the journal profile, the requirements for its design. Materials that do not meet these conditions, in agreement with the Deputy editor-in-chief will be returned to the authors with indication of reasons of refusal.

3. Scientific Articles undergo an editorial scientific examination by experts, determines their compliance of the stated issues, the degree of disclosure of the topic, scientific novelty.

The examination is carried out by the members of the editorial Board — leading experts in the field of standardization and quality.

All scientific articles are verified by Antiplagiat software.

4. The examination is conducted according to the following criteria:

  • correspondence between the title of the article and its content;
  • formulation of the problem or the task;
  • justification of the topicality of presented materials;
  • research the natura of the article;
  • validity of the presentation and findings, in particular the presence of references material and other information sources;
  • scientific novelty and practical significance of the results;
  • findings of the article.

5. In case of revealing of discrepancy of the article to the given criteria, Executive Secretary with the consent of the Deputy editor-in-chief sends the article to one of the members of the Advisory Council to make decisions about the recommendations for improvement of the article or reject it from publication.

6. If the article needs revision, the author receives a review of the Editorial Board member or the Advisory Council member.

After corrections are submitted, the author resends the article to the editorial office.

7. The review is made to the author (authors) in print format. The review can also be sent by e-mail with read receipt messages. The fact of acquaintance is the confirmation by the author (authors) of the receipt of the review.

Author (authors) of the article may submit a reasonable disagreement with the results of the review. The decision on further review the article is accepted by the editor-in-chief or Deputy editor-in-chief.

In case of agreement with the reviewer's comments the author (authors) of the article has the right to make changes and submit the article for review again. In this case the review procedure is repeated. The date of receipt of article is the date of its last submission after editing.

8. The final decision on publication of the article accepted by the editorial Board of the journal, which is recorded in the registration book.

For minor comments that require only editorial review, and with the consent of the author (authors) can be made a decision about publishing the article.

9. The originals of reviews are kept in editorial office for five years from the date of publication and are provided upon request of the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation.

Back >>>